COHESIVE MARKERS IN SOCIAL MEDIA DISCOURSE: CASE IN INDONESIAN FACEBOOK CONVERSATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26499/li.v37i2.120Keywords:
cohesion, conversation, social media, FacebookAbstract
Abstract
The emergence of social media as a new channel of communication has produced a new form discourse which has different characteristics compared to the formerly established conventional discourses. These differences do not only lie in how the messages are delivered but also in their structural components which contribute to the unity of the text, namely cohesion and coherence. Cohesion, as the marker of coherence, is realized by language units (words, phrases, or clauses) known as cohesive markers which indicate the relationship between parts of discourse either grammatically or lexically. This article aims at describing the composition and distribution of cohesive markers within the Facebook conversations along with their roles in determining the characteristics of the discourse. The results show that the cohesive system of Facebook conversations are dominated by references, ellipses, repetitions, and conjunctions. The frequent appearances of certain referential cohesivemarkers indicate Facebook conversations as typical of interactive discourse whereas numerous ellipses and particular conjunctionsreflectthe informal mode of communication carried out through the social media.On the other hand, various repetitions show the existence of topical cohesionwithin the conversations.
References
Anjani, Esa Agita. 2013. “Kohesi dan koherensiwacanastand up comedy Prancis dan Indonesiaâ€. Kawistara, 3 (3): 227-334
Boyd, Dana M & Ellison, Nicole B. 2008. “Social network sites: definition history, and scholarshipâ€. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication. 13: 210-230
Carr, CT & RA Hayes. 2015. “Social media: Defining, developing,and diviningâ€. Atlantic Journal of Communication, 23,46–65
De Beaugrande, Alain-Robert. 1981. Introduction to Discourse. London: Longman
De Beaugrande, Alain-Robert& Wolfgang Dressler. 1981.
Introduction to Text Linguistics. London: Longman
Halliday, MAK &Ruqaiya Hasan. 1976. Cohesion in English. London: Longman Group Ltd.
Halliday & Hasan. 1985. Bahasa, Teks dan Konteks (Trans: Asruddin B. Tou). Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press
Halliday & Matthiessen. 2004. Introduction to Functional Grammar. New York: Routledge
Hoey, Michael. 1991. Patterns of Lexis in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Holt, Richard. 2004. Dialogue On the Internet : Language, Civic Identity, and Computer-mediated Communication Civic Discourse for the Third Millennium. Westport: Greenwood Publishing Group
Jerniati I 2010. “Kohesi konjungtor dalam wacana narasi bahasa Torajaâ€. Humaniora, 22 (1): 94-101
Klebanov, Beata Bleigman, Daniel Diermeier&EyalBeigman. 2008. “Lexical cohesion analysis of political speechâ€. Political Analysis, 16 (4): 447-463
Martin, J. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Munandar, Aris. 2001. “Analisis struktur retorika: alternatif memahami koherensi wacana selebaran Partai Rakyat Demokratikâ€.Humaniora, 13 (2): 150-163
Rohmadi, Arif. 2016. Tips Produktif Ber-social Media. Jakarta: PT Elex Media Komputindo
Statcounter: GlobalStat. 2019. Social Media Stats in Indonesia - June 2019. http://gs.statcounter.com/social-media-stats/all/indonesia. (Diakses 16 Juli 2019)
Statista. 2019a. Global Social Networks Ranked by Numbers. https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/. (Diakses 16 Juli 2019)
Statista. 2019b. Top 15 Countries Based on Number of Facebook User. https://www.statista.com/statistics/268136/top-15-countries-based-on-number-of-facebook-users/. (Diakses 16 Juni 2019)
Schriffin, Deborah. 1985. “Conversational coherence: the role of wellâ€. Language, 61 (3): 640-667
Sukoyo. 2010. “AnalisiswacanapercakapanberbahasaJawa di jejaringsosial Facebook: kajiankohesiâ€. Widyaparwa 40 (2): 21-28
Suryaningsih, Rina. 2014. “Kajian kohesi dan koherensidalam novel LintangkaryaArdiniPangastuti Bnâ€. Jurnal Program Studi Bahasa dan Sastra JawaUniversitas Muhammadiyah Purworejo, 5 (2): 46-51
Thompson, Geoff. 2014. Introducing Functional Grammar. Oxon: Routledge
Thurlow, Crispin, Laura Lengel & Alice Tomic. 2004. Computer Mediated Communication: Social Interaction and the Internet. London: SAGE Publications
Widdowson, H. 1978. Teaching Language as Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press